USPTO serial 76291454
VULCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VULCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy V. Stephens
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLC1111 3RD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing an on-line electronic database in the fields of science, technology, medicine and health, and computer programming and computer multimedia programming on global computer networks, wide-area networks and local-area networks; computer programming services for others; multimedia programming services in the fields of science, technology, medicine and health; providing information in the fields of science, technology, medicine and health, and computer programming and multimedia programming in the fields of science, technology, medicine and health, via websites on global computer networks; web-hosting services for others; assessment and counseling services related thereto based on educational test results | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |