USPTO serial 76291466
DIGIMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGIMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital still cameras; personal communications equipment, namely, personal digital assistants; electronic apparatus for receiving, recording, reproducing, and processing sound and/or images, namely, digital video disc players, compact disc players, changers and recorders; radios, surround sound processors, MP3 players, audio sound reproduction systems consisting of loudspeakers and one or more of the following - radio tuner, compact disc player and tape player; two-way communications equipment, namely, family radio service transceivers; telephones; television receivers incorporating am-fm radio receivers, television receivers incorporating MP3 players, and radio receivers and transceivers incorporating MP3 players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMI GLOBAL, INC
- Other trademarks owned by EXECUTIVE MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXECUTIVE MARKETING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIGIMATE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |