USPTO serial 76291609
FOODTUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOODTUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R. Leonard
MARK R LEONARD DAVIS & LEONARD LLP8880 CAL CTR DR STE 180SACRAMENTO, CA 95826UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Organic fertilizers for horticultural and agricultural use and delivery system sold therewith as a unit comprising horticultural plant nutrients that are soluble and a tube for feeding the nutrients to the plant | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |