USPTO serial 76291647
SUSSEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUSSEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4M3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P SCOTT MACLEAN
P SCOTT MACLEAN CASSAN MACLEANSTE 40180 ABERDEEN STOTTAWA, CANADA K1S 5R5,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper products, namely paper towels, serviettes, napkins, facial tissue and bathroom tissue | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |