USPTO serial 76291746
LOUISVILLE FIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOUISVILLE FIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment Services, namely organizing and presenting football games before live audiences and on television, radio, for global computer network display and other media | ACTIVE | Dec 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |