Drawing for CHOCOLATE CHERRY MAMBO

USPTO serial 76291758

CHOCOLATE CHERRY MAMBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHOCOLATE CHERRY MAMBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick C. Stephenson

PATRICK C STEPHENSON MCGRATH NORTH MULLIN & KRATZ, PC LLOSTE 3700 FIRST NATIONAL TWR1601 DODGE STOMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ice creamACTIVESep 10, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 18, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 13, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 11, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance