Drawing for COLOR CALL

USPTO serial 76291877

COLOR CALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COLOR CALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bujold,

MICHAEL J BUJOLD DAVIS & BUJOLD, PLLC500 N COMMERCIAL ST STE 4MANCHESTER, NH 03101-1151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in color and texture comparisons of furnishing or decorating materials, namely, paint, carpet, flooring, curtains, wall covering and fabrics, and for comparison between two or more samples of such materials, or between a sample of such material and a color scale; software for use in creating decorating material as listed above identical with the sample of having non-identical relationship, such as by being and a complimentary color; computer database software for use in providing in formation as to sources, stock control or distribution of furnishing or decorating material as aforesaid; data processing and peripheral equipment, namely, scanners, video displays and communication equipment, namely, modems, for use in conjunction with the aforesaid software, and parts and fittings for the aforesaid equipmentACTIVE—
042Consultancy, design, research and development services in the field of color comparison; consultancy, design, research and development services in the field of software and hardware for color comparison in relation to color or texture of furnishing or decorating materials, including paint, carpet, flooring, curtaining, wall covering and fabricsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance