USPTO serial 76291961
WORKSHOP SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORKSHOP SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Patterson
WILLIAM B PATTERSON MOSER PATTERSON & SHERIDAN, LLP3040 POST OAK BLVD STE 1500HOUSTON, TX 77056UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | HAND TOOLS, namely, clamps, and vises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |