Drawing for WORKSHOP SERIES

USPTO serial 76291961

WORKSHOP SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKSHOP SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William B. Patterson

WILLIAM B PATTERSON MOSER PATTERSON & SHERIDAN, LLP3040 POST OAK BLVD STE 1500HOUSTON, TX 77056UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008HAND TOOLS, namely, clamps, and visesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 6, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 19, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance