USPTO serial 76292032
DW512
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2007
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DW512?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MIDLAND, MI
Birch Vale, High Peak, GB
Birch Vale, High Peak, GB
Birch Vale, High Peak, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Timothy Hobbs
J TIMOTHY HOBBS WILEY REIN & FIELDING LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on 44(e)) chemical preparations containing polyurethane elastomers for use in the manufacture of coatings and finishing compositions; chemicals for manufacturing polyurethane elastomers; thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers for general industrial use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Corrosion inhibitants in the nature of an elastomer coating for oil pipes; corrosion inhibitants in the nature of an elastomer coating for oil pipes having thermal and protective insulation properties; thermal and protective insulation coatings in the nature of exterior paints for use on pipes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 22, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperlast Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperlast Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Hyperlast Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named DW512
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |