USPTO serial 76292038
RIHADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIHADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABRIELLE S ROTH
GABRIELLE S ROTH DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOAPS, NAMELY, SOAPS FOR BATHS, SOAPS FOR BEAUTY CARE, LIQUID SOAPS, AND TOILET SOAPS; HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOOS, HAIR RINSES, HAIR GELS, HAIR LOTIONS, HAIR CREAMS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, HAIR TREATMENT PREPARATIONS, HAIR SPRAYS, HAIR TONICS, NON-MEDICATED SCURF CREAMS, AND HAIR MOUSSES; SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MASSAGE GELS, MILK LOTIONS, SKIN LOTIONS, BODY LOTIONS, SHAVING LOTIONS, VANISHING CREAMS, CLEANSING CREAMS, TOILET OILS, MASSAGE OILS, BATH OILS, SUNTAN OILS, BABY OILS, SKIN FRESHENERS, SUN MILKS, SUNTAN CREAMS, SUNTAN LOTIONS, SUN SCREEN LOTIONS, SUN SCREEN CREAMS, HAND CREAMS, TALCUM POWDERS, BATH POWDERS AND BABY POWDERS; COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIP CONDITIONERS; FRAGRANCES, NAMELY, EAU DE COLOGNES, PERFUMES, LAVENDER OILS, AND CLOVE OILS; NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS, FALSE NAILS; FALSE EYELASHES; ADHESIVES FOR WEARING FALSE EYELASHES; BEAUTY MASKS FOR THE FACE AND BODY; BATH ESSENCES AND BATH EXTRACTS, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED BATH AGENTS THAT ENHANCE RELAXATION AND PROMOTE SKIN AND BODY CARE; AND DENTRIFICE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | BEAUTY CULTURE SERVICES, NAMELY, HAIRDRESSING SERVICES, BEAUTY TREATMENT SERVICES, AND BEAUTY SALON SERVICES; CONSULTATION SERVICES RELATING TO BEAUTY CULTURE AND HAIRDRESSING; PROVIDING INFORMATION ON BEAUTY CULTURE AND HAIRDRESSING; PROVIDING BATHING FACILITIES; PROVISION OF INFORMATION ON FASHION; DESIGN SERVICES, NAMELY, FASHION DESIGN, FURNITURE DESIGN, PERSONAL ORNAMENTS AND JEWELRY DESIGN, HAIR STYLE DESIGN, AND PACKAGING DESIGN; DESIGN AND TESTING OF COSMETICS FOR OTHERS; MASSAGE SERVICES; ACUPUNCTURE SERVICES; NUTRITION CONSULTATION; AND RENTAL OF CLOTHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Lumielina
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Lumielina
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RIHADA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |