Drawing for BBM

USPTO serial 76292177

BBM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAST, PAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BBM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037INSTALLATION, FITTING, MAINTENANCE, MONITORING, CLEANING AND REPAIR OF INDUSTRIAL DEVICES, APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY AND AUTOMATION SYSTEMS WHICH PERTAIN TO THE FIELDS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, ELECTRONICS, COMPUTER SCIENCE, PRECISION MECHANICS AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGACTIVE—
042TECHNICAL ADVISORY SERVICES AND TECHNICAL CONSULTATIONS FOR INDUSTRY IN THE FIELDS OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES, ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, COMPUTER NETWORKS, MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; DESIGN PLANNING OF INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES, ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, COMPUTER NETWORKS AND MECHANICAL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS FOR INDUSTRYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance