USPTO serial 76292333
CHRISTIAN DEFENSE FUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHRISTIAN DEFENSE FUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Goch
DAVID P GOCH WEBSTER CHAMBERLAIN BEAN1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4693UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications and periodicals, namely, books, syndicated column reviews, newspapers and magazines in the field of history, government, current events, civics and religion | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | credit card services, debt card services, life and medical insurance administration services and charitable fundraising | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | news agencies, namely, gathering, analysis and dissemination of news and information regarding government and current events; automobile club services, lodging services in the nature of bed and breakfast services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mail America Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mail America Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHRISTIAN DEFENSE FUND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |