USPTO serial 76292603
PAM FORUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2005
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAM FORUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline C. Smith
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP2300 N St., N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROMOTING INDUSTRY STANDARDIZATION OF TELEPHONY AND INTERNET PROTOCOL TECHNOLOGIES VIA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, DEVELOPING AND PROVIDING SPECIFICATIONS AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS THAT ALLOW COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS TO SECURELY SHARE AUTHORIZED INFORMATION ABOUT SUBSCRIBERS' IDENTITY, PRESENCE AND AVAILABILITY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |