USPTO serial 76292686
DISTINGUISHED RESORT GOODS ORIGINAL TRADEMARK OLD MAUI BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DISTINGUISHED RESORT GOODS ORIGINAL TRADEMARK OLD MAUI BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas Lipstone
DOUGLAS LIPSTONE BUCHALTER, NEMER, FIELDS & YOUNGER601 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2400LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5709UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume, cologne and cosmetics, namely eye shadow, lipstick, lip gloss, blush, nail polish, nail polish remover, loose facial powder, moisturizer in the form of a Vitamin E stick for application to the face and body, eye makeup remover, facial cleanser, astringent for cosmetic purposes, skin moisturizer, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, bubble bath and body lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |