USPTO serial 76292706
DITZY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DITZY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oakville, Ontario L6J 7W1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD E. HEWSON
DONALD E HEWSON MARKS & CLERK350 BURNHAMTHORPE RD W STE 602MISSISSAUGA, ON L5B 3J1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | DEPILATORY PREPARATIONS AND RELATED ACCESSORIES, NAMELY CREAMS, WAXES, WAXING STRIPS, WAXING STENCILS, TWEEZING GUIDES; MAKE-UP, INCLUDING EYEBROW STENCILS AND ARTIFICIAL EYELASHES; MAKE-UP REMOVER; NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS FOR USE WITH TRUE AND ARTIFICIAL FINGERNAILS AND TOENAILS; HAND CARE AND FOOT CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY SOAPS, MILKS, CREAMS, LOTIONS, SERUMS, GELS, PARAFFIN WAX, OILS, MASKS; HAND CARE AND FOOT CARE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY PUMICE STONES AND EMERY BOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |