USPTO serial 76292708
PIXELINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3037035Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 3, 2006
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PIXELINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas N Young
Thomas N Young Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane PC3001 West Big Beaver RoadSuite 624Troy, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | imaging hardware and software that captures, stores and transmits images to a computing device but not including electronic systems comprised of a camera and a digital data storage device, namely, a computer hard drive and/or solid state memory, used to record and store audio and video information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |