USPTO serial 76292713
BIG KEVIN'S BAYOU BLEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIG KEVIN'S BAYOU BLEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Orleans, LA
New Orleans, LA
New Orleans, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Brinson
RAYMOND BRINSON RAYMOND BRINSON ATTORNEY AT LAWP O BOX 1957SLIDELL, LA 70459-1957UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Spices and seasonings, as food additives for human consumption | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |