Drawing for COMMUNICATION VIRTUAL MACHINE

USPTO serial 76292726

COMMUNICATION VIRTUAL MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMUNICATION VIRTUAL MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean F. Heneghan

SEAN F HENEGHAN FISH & RICHARDSON PC225 FRANKLIN ST FL 32BOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware for use in the field of telecommunications, digital broadcasting and communications technology; computer software for use in managing, designing, and developing communications systems, software and signal processing applications for semiconductors and semiconductor architectures; computer hardware and software for testing, modeling, and integrating telecommunications protocols, protocol stacks, systems and equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance