USPTO serial 76292809
POLISH OFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2765074Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POLISH OFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AMERICAN REPUBLIC BRANDS, L.L.C.
ST. LOUIS, MO
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
St. Louis, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIRK SANDERS
KIRK SANDERS VI- JON LABORATORIE INC8515 PAGE AVESAINT LOUIS, MO 63114-6014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | nail polish remover; artificial fingernail remover kits comprised of a container containing removing compound and a sponge with openings to admit the nail of the user | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICAN REPUBLIC BRANDS, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vi-Jon Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named POLISH OFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2005 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |