USPTO serial 76292843
SAFEVILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFEVILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS
KRISTIN JORDAN HARKINS CONLEY ROSE, PC5700 GRANITE PKWY STE 330PLANO, TX 75024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Commercial and residential security, communication and intercom wired and wireless systems equipment comprised of television monitors, anti-intrusion alarms, motion detectors, video cameras, control panels, smoke detectors, glass break detectors, shock detectors, ultrasonic detectors, voice recorders and speakers, and operating software and hardware; wired and wireless remote arming and disarming controls for accessing and controlling security, communication and intercom systems, electricity, lights, air conditioning, heating, electronic equipment and locks | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring commercial and residential security, communication and intercom systems; computer services, namely controlling security systems, communication and intercom systems, electricity, lights, air conditioning, heating, electronic equipment and locks via remote access by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SECURITY BROADBAND MONITORING, LP
- Other trademarks owned by @Security Broadband Monitoring, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SAFEVILLAGE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |