USPTO serial 76292872
MIOP MOTIVATION INSTITUTE OF PHILADELPHIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIOP MOTIVATION INSTITUTE OF PHILADELPHIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PHILADELPHIA, PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN BORDEN EVANS
LUCILLE W. IJOY MOTIVATION INSTITUTE OF PHILADELPHIA1325 YERKES ST.PHILADELPHIA, PA 19119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, RETREATS, AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON WOMEN'S ISSUES, STRESS MANAGEMENT, TEAM-BUILDING AND TIME MANAGEMENT AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN THE WORK PLACE; EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING MOTIVATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SPEAKERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IJOY, LUCILLE W.
- Other trademarks owned by IJOY, LUCILLE W.
- Other trademarks owned by IJOY, LUCILLE W.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MIOP MOTIVATION INSTITUTE OF PHILADELPHIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |