USPTO serial 76292896
AMOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SYLVIA D. DAVIS
SYLVIA D DAVIS KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NWSTE 700 - E LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications apparatus and equipment, namely, routers, modems, network interface cards, Ethernet adapters, printed circuit boards, repeaters, digital signal processors, multiplexers, analog-to-digital converters, digital-to-analog converters, backplanes, filters, hubs, Ethernet switches, central processing units, integrated circuits, and software sold as a unit therewith; telephony hardware, namely, wireless base stations, subscriber stations, PSTN gateways, Internet gateways, telephone handsets, antennas, voicemail servers, voicemail clients, radio transceivers, paging equipment, wireless local loop systems and equipment therefor, voice and data telecommunication equipment, switching equipment, and software sold as a unit therewith; telephony software for use in telephone networks, namely, telephone operating systems, custom calling feature software including caller-identification, call forwarding, call-waiting, voice over IP (VOIP) processing software, telephone call processing software; computer software for use in data networks, namely, packet-switching software, circuit-switching software, billing software, codecs, firewalls, IP address managers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |