USPTO serial 76293185
THREE FOX VINEYARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THREE FOX VINEYARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DELAPLANE, VA, US
Fairfax Station, VA, US
Fairfax Station, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John D. Pellegrin
JOHN D PELLEGRIN LAW OFFICES OF JOHN D PELLEGRIN PC10515 DOMINION VALLEY DRFAIRFAX STATION, VA 22039UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Three Fox Ventures, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Three Fox Ventures, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Three Fox Ventures, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named THREE FOX VINEYARDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 17, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 17, 2017 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 13, 2016 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 14, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 8, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |