Drawing for ACCE, CERTIFIED IN CLINICAL ENGINEERING(CCE)

USPTO serial 76293266

ACCE, CERTIFIED IN CLINICAL ENGINEERING(CCE)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCE, CERTIFIED IN CLINICAL ENGINEERING(CCE)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol R. Kirchick

CAROL R KIRCHICK RICH MAY, PC176 FEDERAL ST 6TH FLBOSTON, MA 02110-2223UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
BDevelopment, maintenance management, and safety management of clinical equipment and related high technology systems in the healthcare industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance