USPTO serial 76293327
SHIMMERING RAINFOREST CHARACTER COLLECTION SHIMMERING WIND-HARP BUTTERFLIES JALINDA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JALISA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JAHA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JAJA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JUMA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JELANI THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHIMMERING RAINFOREST CHARACTER COLLECTION SHIMMERING WIND-HARP BUTTERFLIES JALINDA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JALISA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JAHA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JAJA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JUMA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JELANI THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Cartoon prints, cartoon strips, cartoons to be submitted for publication by publishers and periodicals, and illustrations, which may include text with visual art, or just the visual art; leaflets and series of booklets of printed text materials, specifically, stories and poems; leaflets, series of booklets, storybooks, and playbooks for children, which contain any or all of these-- paper dolls, coloring book pages, stories, poems, illustrations, games, connect-the-dots pictures, snowflake cutting patterns, suggestions for children's activities, and patterns for toys, pillows, and decals for T-shirts, pajamas, and mugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jyothi Light, Prema
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SHIMMERING RAINFOREST CHARACTER COLLECTION SHIMMERING WIND-HARP BUTTERFLIES JALINDA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JALISA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JAHA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JAJA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JUMA THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFLY JELANI THE WIND-HARP BUTTERFL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 13, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |