USPTO serial 76293339
ENGLISH STONE VILLA GARDEN TILES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2892282Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 12, 2004
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENGLISH STONE VILLA GARDEN TILES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WACO, TX
WACO, TX
WACO, TX
Waco, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dan Pleitz
DAN PLEITZ NAMAN, HOWELL, SMITH & LEE900 WASHINGTON AVEP O BOX 1470WACO, TX 76703-1470Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | LANDSCAPE EDGING AND BORDERS, NAMELY LENGTHS OF PLASTIC DECORATIVE EDGING FOR DELIMITING GARDENS AND FLOWER BEDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EASY GARDENER PRODUCTS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by EASY GARDENER PRODUCTS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by EASY GARDENER PRODUCTS, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Easy Gardener, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ENGLISH STONE VILLA GARDEN TILES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |