Drawing for NOV-COPAK CLOSED SYSTEM

USPTO serial 76293418

NOV-COPAK CLOSED SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NOV-COPAK CLOSED SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise Philyaw

DENISE PHILYAW FMARK L L C7617 STATE RTE 31RICHMOND, IL 60071-9573UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Returnable, Refillable Plastic Storage Drum used to Transport Chemicals in a Closed SystemACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2002ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Mar 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2002NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance