USPTO serial 76293458
ICE AGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICE AGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daphne Gronich
JON DEL BARRIO FOX GROUP LEGALINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTP O BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films, pre-recorded video tapes, video cassettes, videodiscs, pre-recorded audio tapes, audio cassettes and audio compact discs, all featuring animated entertainment and musical performances; computer game cassettes, computer game cartridges and computer game CD-ROMS adapted for use with television receivers; computer game equipment containing memory devices, namely discs and cartridges; hand-held computer game CD-ROMS; computer and video software featuring animated motion picture entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named ICE AGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |