USPTO serial 76293474
TIDAL SOFTWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2004
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIDAL SOFTWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
San Jose, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq.
Sally M. Abel, Esq. FENWICK & WEST LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for enterprise process integration, event scheduling, automating repetitive operations, integrating and managing business processes, and real-time automation of e-commerce applications in the field of automating, managing and operating computer systems and computer data centers; computer programs used in the automation, management and operation of computer systems and computer data centers to provide the functions of process design, real-time process execution and end-to end process management across independent applications and disparate platforms; computer software to integrate legacy and newly developed applications, provide web-enabled operations and cross-platform integration; computer software for event modeling and simulation, real-time process monitoring, analysis and management, and automated process documentation and archiving; and user manuals sold together as a unit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 1997 |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software for others; professional and technical consulting services in relation to computers, computer software, computer system and data center operations, enterprise process integration, event scheduling, event modeling and simulation, automated process documentation and archiving, integrating and managing business processes, process design, real-time process execution and end-to-end process management across independent applications and disparate platforms; monitoring, control and management of computer systems; maintenance and support services for computer software, namely telephone consultation, debugging computer software, updating computer software, providing electronic and on-line bulletin boards and reference information, and web sites, all in the fields of computers, computer software and computer systems; computer systems and computer software development and operations consulting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TIDAL SOFTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TIDAL SOFTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TIDAL SOFTWARE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cisco Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TIDAL SOFTWARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |