USPTO serial 76293570
RADIOLOGY ROUNDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RADIOLOGY ROUNDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER KATZ
PETER KATZ ESQ DAY, BERRY & HOWARD LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely providing an on-line medical newsletter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |