USPTO serial 76293668
WHAM!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHAM!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | STAIN REMOVER FOR PORCELAIN, FIBERGLASS, TILE, GROUT, METAL SURFACES, SYNTHETIC SURFACES, VINYL, WOOD, MARBLE, LINOLEUM, PLASTIC SURFACES, GLASS, PAINTED SURFACES, BRICK, STONE AND CONCRETE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |