USPTO serial 76293697
HOT LINKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3220979Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2007
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOT LINKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOFINA FOODS INC./ALIMENTS SOFINA INC.
BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by SOFINA FOODS INC./ALIMENTS SOFINA INC.
BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
FERNDALE, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alicia Morris Groos
Alicia Morris Groos NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1100Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat products, namely, sausage | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOFINA FOODS INC./ALIMENTS SOFINA INC.
- Other trademarks owned by QUALITY MEAT GROUP LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by QUALITY MEAT GROUP LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by QUALITY MEAT GROUP LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Premium Brands Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HEMPLER FOODS GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named HOT LINKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2018 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2018 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 21, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |