USPTO serial 76293724
GIRLY GIRLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIRLY GIRLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARRON T BRROWMAN
ARRON T BRROWMAN KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely paper sewing patterns for making articles of clothing, quilts, bedding items namely blankets, sheets, crib bumpers, diaper stackers, infant organizers, decorative items for the home namely table runners, wall decor and curtains, paper book covers, greeting cards, announcement cards, paper art prints, photographs, paper gift wrap, paper bows for decoration, paper bags, paper boxes, stationery, albums, namely, scrapbook and photographic albums, rubber stamps, paper bows and ribbon for decoration, self-adhesive stickers made of paper, books, namely, educational how-to books in the fields of sewing and crafts, sewing instructional books | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |