USPTO serial 76293896
BERGHOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2003
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BERGHOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lodi, CA
LODI, CA
Lodi, CA
Lodi, CA
Lodi, CA
Lodi, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Spencer F. Owen
Spencer F. Owen Owen, Wickersham & Erickson, P.C.2300 Clayton Road, Suite 1400One Concord CenterConcord, CA 94520Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE | ACTIVE | Dec 26, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BERGHOLD WINE SALES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BERGHOLD WINE SALES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Berghold, Joseph P.
- Other trademarks owned by Berghold, Joseph P.
- Other trademarks owned by Berghold, Kay B.
- Other trademarks owned by Berghold, Kay B.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named BERGHOLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 23, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 4, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |