Drawing for ENCONTROL

USPTO serial 76294048

ENCONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENCONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew B. Katz

ANDREW B KATZ FOX ROTHSCHILD, LLP2000 MARKET ST TENTH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Energy monitoring and utility metering services, namely electronic monitoring of electricity, gas, fuel, power, water, air pressure, and steam in commercial and industrial facilities for the purposes of allowing professional managers to analyze cost, budget, benchmarking, production process output and trend information relating to their company's use of energy, electricity, gas, fuel, power, water, air pressure and steamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance