Drawing for CHIP & COOKIE

USPTO serial 76294064

CHIP & COOKIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIP & COOKIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen E. Goldstein

STEPHEN E GOLDSTEIN DWYER SCHRAFF & MEYER900 FORT STSTE 1800HONOLULU, HI 96813-3715

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper goods, namely, children's books, picture books, comic books, coloring books, trading cards and playing cardsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, children's coats, sweatshirts, sweatpants, T-shirts, pants, shoes, hats, gloves, mittens, undergarments, dresses, skirts, pullovers, sweaters, vests, jeans, shorts, overalls, pajamas, bathing suits, socks, bath robes and beltsACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, stuffed dolls, action figures, board games, play houses, play sets, manipulative puzzles and jigsaw puzzles, and toy ovensACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 11, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 11, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 25, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 14, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance