Drawing for RICKY CARMICHAEL

USPTO serial 76294223

RICKY CARMICHAEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICKY CARMICHAEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy L. Naylor

18400 Sutter BlvdMorgan Hill, CA 95037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Decals, stickers and catalogs relating to motocross sports clothing, protective clothing, protective gear, casual wear and accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance