Drawing for PRECISION PROFILING

USPTO serial 76294313

PRECISION PROFILING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2921066Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 25, 2005
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PRECISION PROFILING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eligio C. Pimentel

Eligio C. Pimentel McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.500 W Madison St34th FlChicago, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Software for use with microprocessor-controlled reflow soldering machines sold as an integral component of the goodsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 31, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 3, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 20118.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jan 28, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2011ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 9, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 25, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2004REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 1, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2004SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 11, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 5, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance