Drawing for Serial No. 76294326

USPTO serial 76294326

Serial No. 76294326

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76294326?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer M. Lantz

Jennifer M. Lantz MacPherson Kwok Chen & Heid LLP2033 Gateway PlaceSuite 400San Jose, CA 95110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009LCD screens, semiconductor control chip for controlling LCD screens, software for enabling LCD screens display, software enabling persons to create images for display on LCD screen, data compression software, and hardware and software electronic imaging, namely generating, storing, transmitting, or manipulation of graphic images, both natural, namely photographic stills and motion pictures, and computer generated, namely text, icons, animation, and the like, for computer display screens, projectors, televisions, cameras, cell phones, and other portable electronic equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 27, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 3, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 22, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance