USPTO serial 76294339
VALUE FOR VALUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALUE FOR VALUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl M. Zielaznicki, Esq.
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI ESQ JENKENS & GILCHRIST PARKER CHAPIN LLPTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-0002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Value for Value is a service provided to the consumer which allows them to interact with traditional ads in a digital manner. they can use their cell phones by dialing an abbreviated dialing code placed on advertisements. There are alternate methods of initiating with the system, and 900 land line number and via a website. Whether they use a cell phone, land line or website, they are prompted to enter a promotion code. the system then delivers an advertisement to that person. Consumers must fill out a short registration page with some demographical data and then they can choose to have the messages they request sent to them via e-mail, SMS (short messaging system - a text message to their cell phones), or a separate inbox tool. an important principal of the service is value for value. the advertisers must provide the consumers with value to get the information they want from those consumers. so from the consumer point of view, this business is a consumer friendly, message delivery system. The other part of the business is the back end data analytics. We will provide aggregate data analytics regarding consumers in general, what they like and don't like based on all available factors such as age, gender, location, etc. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |