USPTO serial 76294340
BIOACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Frankfurt am Main, DE
Frankfurt am Main, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Lawrence
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ARTICLE OF CLOTHING, NAMELY, JACKETS, COATS, RAINCOATS, WIND-RESISTANT JACKETS, PANTS, SKI WEAR, SHORTS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, DRESSES, HEADWEAR, HATS, GLOVES, SHOES, FOUL-WEATHER GEAR, JOGGING SUITS, MUFFLERS, COVERALLS, SNOW SUITS, TENNIS WEAR AND UNDERWEAR, EXCLUDING HOSIERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |