USPTO serial 76294450
REACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3647937Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tirzah Abe Lowe
Tirzah Abe Lowe KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 Main Street 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | commercial information services provided on-line from a computer database or the internet; outsourcing in the field of telecommunications and information technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 22, 2002 |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE DATA, GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF A TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPHIC CABLE AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSION; LOCAL, LONG DISTANCE AND INTERNATIONAL VOICE, TEXT, FACSIMILE, VIDEO AND DATA TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; DELIVERY OF MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENT VIA COMPUTER TERMINAL; ELECTRONIC VOICE MESSAGING, NAMELY, THE RECORDING, STORAGE AND SUBSEQUENT TRANSMISSION OF VOICE MESSAGES BY TELEPHONE; ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, IMAGES, SIGNALS AND MESSAGES; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; VOICE MAIL AND MESSAGING SERVICES; AUDIO AND VIDEO CONFERENCING; PROVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS AND LINKS TO COMPUTER DATABASES AND THE INTERNET, PROVIDING A HIGH SPEED ACCESS TO AREA NETWORKS AND A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING ACCESS TO COMPUTER DATABASES AND THE INTERNET; PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 22, 2002 |
| 042 | DESIGN AND TESTING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reach Brands Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Reach Brands Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Reach Brands Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REACH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 15, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 16, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |