USPTO serial 76294521
K-N KAREN NEUBURGER LIFE SHOULD BE COMFORTABLE.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with K-N KAREN NEUBURGER LIFE SHOULD BE COMFORTABLE.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Rafael, CA
San Rafael, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. O'Connell
JEFFREY A O'CONNELL SHARTSIS FRIESE & GINSBURG LLP1 MARITIME PLZ FL 18SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Soap boxes; perfume burners; perfume sprayers sold empty; vaporizers for perfume sold empty; statuettes of porcelain, terra-cotta, glass; toilet brushes; printed toilet tissue holders; printed wastepaper baskets; vanity cases; serving trays not of precious metal; flower pots; flower pot covers; crockery; earthenware, namely, pots, bowls and plates; porcelain ware, namely, pots and bowls; glass bowls, flasks, vases; and beverage glassware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |