USPTO serial 76294522
EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4110526Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2012
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael P. Brennan; Lisa M. DuRoss
Michael P. Brennan; Lisa M. DuRoss Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200TROY, MI 48098UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | manually operated metal valves; manually operated metal thermal expansion valves; manually operated metal ball valves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Compressors for machines; machine parts, namely, drive shafts sold as a component of compressors for machines; electric compressors for heat pumps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | mechanical gas pressure regulators; temperature and moisture condition monitors for machines; machine controls, namely, electric reversers, electronic speed controllers, adjustable speed drivers, dynamo electric controls for electric motors, starting electric controls for electric motors for machines; radio frequency (RF) and wireless transmitters for use with moisture, humidity and/or temperature sensors, and with moisture, humidity and/or temperature indicators, recorders and control units; electric timers and thermostats; electronic and electro-mechanical temperature control valves; temperature responsive, flame responsive, and pressure responsive switching devices in the nature of electric switches, electric temperature controls, and thermostats; automatic flow control valves for refrigerating units; automatic control valves; electro-mechanical instruments in the nature of electronic sensors for use in measuring the pressure and flow of a valve or regulator; automatic check valves; automatic ball check valves; pressure relief automatic valves; safety valves, namely, shut-off valves for refrigeration and pneumatic circuits; automatic regulating valves; automatic valves for zone control in heating systems; automatic ball valves; combination automatic valves; solenoid valves; automatic valves; electromechanical controls for heating, cooling and refrigeration units; high temperature electronic oil controls; overheat electronic controls for use in electrical heaters; gas burner electronic controls; control valves for regulating the flow of gases and liquids; electronic temperature control valves; thermostats; thermostat automatic valves; electromechanical controls for appliances and refrigeration, heating, ventilation and air conditioning units; solid state temperature electronic controllers; overheat electronic controls that prevent machinery from overheating; electronic temperature control apparatus for control of heating/cooling units used in commercial applications; oil and gas burner electronic controls for boilers; solid-state flame detecting oil and gas burner controls for boilers; electromechanical power controllers for controlling HVAC/R systems and electronic control panels; electromechanical power controllers and electronic control panels for use with HVAC/R and energy management equipment; quality control instruments and equipment for predicting and detecting failures in high priority equipment, for monitoring the state of machines in the nature of electronic sensors; electronic computer monitors for monitoring operation of motors and machines; condensing units in the nature of condensers; power condition and room site management systems, namely, devices in the nature of computer-based sensors that predict and detect early failures in high-priority equipment and that offer immediate notification of machine and equipment problems, and advanced diagnostics to monitor the states of HVAC, refrigeration and lighting systems and equipment; electronic transmitters sold as a component of HVAC/R units; temperature sensors; remote operations electrical controllers; digital mass flow transmitters, multivariable transmitters; gauge pressure digital transmitters; electronic sensors; temperature validators in the nature of thermometers; electromechanical controls and pressure sensors; voltage regulators; pressure regulators; temperature regulators; fuel pressure regulators; voltage regulator by-pass electric switches; monitoring systems, namely, event recorders; electrical controllers; electrical voltage regulators; AC line voltage regulators; air, fuel and voltage regulators; electromechanical controllers for compressor packs; electromechanical controllers for display cases; timer electric switches sold as a component of thermostats; motor overload protectors in the nature of voltage surge protectors; circuit boards; liquid level flow measurement event recorders and electrical controllers; monitoring systems, namely, flow measurement event recorders and electrical controllers; electric switches; electronic controls for electrical heating units; electric sensors; voltage surge suppressors; surge protectors; electronic controllers for blowers for ventilating, heating and cooling purposes in other than land vehicles; automatic flow control valves for refrigeration units; automatic flow control valves for HVAC/R units; electric heating element controllers; refrigerant leak detectors, namely, detection units, comprised of ultra-violet lamps, florescent dyes and dye injectors; electrical controllers for heating elements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | air filters sold as component parts for HVAC/R units; filter driers for use in HVAC/R and lighting systems; electric fans excluding box and window fans with blades twenty inches in diameters or less; filter driers used in drying and decontaminating fluids; electric heating units for HVAC/R systems and appliances; air filter-driers for use in refrigerant lines; electric air blowers for commercial, industrial, and institutional use; household and commercial air cleaners; electronic igniters for boilers; electric igniters for boilers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | energy usage management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Remote monitoring of energy systems; remote monitoring of HVAC/R and lighting systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EMERSON CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 13, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 21, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |