USPTO serial 76294622
GURU ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENNINGS, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GURU ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gretchen R. Stroud
GRETCHEN R STROUD COOLEY GODWARD LLPFIVE PALO ALTO SQ3000 EL CAMINO REAL BLDG 5PALO ALTO, CA 94306-2197Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing information via a global computer network in the field of recruiting and employment for independent professionals; providing online resources and reference materials for and about independent professionals; employment agency services | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |