USPTO serial 76294692
WHITEHAT SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHITEHAT SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WEB-BASED INFORMATION SECURITY, WEB APPLICATION SECURITY, COMPUTER NETWORK SECURITY, PARTNER INTEGRATION SECURITY, INFORMATION SECURITY ASSESSMENT, SECURITY AUDIT AND SECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSE | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | WEB APPLICATION SECURITY, COMPUTER NETWORK PROTECTION AND INFORMATION SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER NETWORK PROTECTION AND SECURITY CONSULTATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS RELATED TO WEB APPLICATION SECURITY, COMPUTER NETWORK SECURITY, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SANITIZATION SOFTWARE AND OF SECURITY AUDIT SOFTWARE, DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK RELATED TO COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |