Drawing for WHITEHAT SECURITY

USPTO serial 76294692

WHITEHAT SECURITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITEHAT SECURITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF WEB-BASED INFORMATION SECURITY, WEB APPLICATION SECURITY, COMPUTER NETWORK SECURITY, PARTNER INTEGRATION SECURITY, INFORMATION SECURITY ASSESSMENT, SECURITY AUDIT AND SECURITY INCIDENT RESPONSEACTIVE—
041WEB APPLICATION SECURITY, COMPUTER NETWORK PROTECTION AND INFORMATION SECURITY EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICESACTIVE—
042COMPUTER NETWORK PROTECTION AND SECURITY CONSULTATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS RELATED TO WEB APPLICATION SECURITY, COMPUTER NETWORK SECURITY, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SANITIZATION SOFTWARE AND OF SECURITY AUDIT SOFTWARE, DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK RELATED TO COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Apr 2, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 29, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance