USPTO serial 76294785
UNWIRED BY NAVINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2840822Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2004
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNWIRED BY NAVINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
SAN JOSE, CA
Richardson, TX
Richardson, TX
Richardson, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel, Esq.
Sally M. Abel, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetMountain View, CA 94041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunication and data communication related goods, namely, base station antennas and base station receivers; network access devices, namely modems; wireless broadband technology access components included in devices such as PCs, PDAs, computer servers, satellite systems, firewall systems; network management devices, namely, network management shelves containing controller cards, network management adapters and related software, computer software for subscriber management systems; transmitters; transceivers; Ethernet cards; antennas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 12, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CISCO-NAVINI NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Navini Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Navini Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Navini Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named UNWIRED BY NAVINI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 11, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |