USPTO serial 76294954
PRO GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal S. Greenfield
CHRISTINE BENENATI ESQ PITNEY, HARDIN, KIPP & SZUCH LLP685 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | applying protective coatings to outdoor scoreboards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |