USPTO serial 76294975
WORLD CLASS GOURMET COFFEES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3175765Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WORLD CLASS GOURMET COFFEES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ATLANTA, GA
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
Wilmington, DE
NEW ORLEANS, LA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia K. Sutherland
Julia K. Sutherland Seyfarth Shaw LLP131 South Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DS WATERS OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MARIGNY CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by MARIGNY CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by MARIGNY CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD COMPANIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named WORLD CLASS GOURMET COFFEES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |