USPTO serial 76295155
XCELOVENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XCELOVENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hertfordshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS ET AL12010 SUNSET HLS RDSTE 900RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS ANT) SUBSTANCES FOR THE TREATMENT OF MEDICAL DISEASES, ILLNESSES, AND CONDITIONS RELATED TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM,ENDOCRINE DISORDERS, MUSCULAR SKELETAL CONDITIONS, ANTI-VIRAL CONDITIONS, PAIN CONTROL, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION CONDITIONS, ANTI-ADDICTIVE CONDITIONS, VACCINES, RESPIRATORY CONDITIONS, AND ALLERGIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, NAMELY, A DEVICE THAT PROVIDES BREATH-ACTUATED DELIVERY OF DRUGS FROM PRESSURIZED METERED DOSE INHALERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; EXPLOITATION AND LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | MEDICAL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |